"sm70- why not Duesenberg?" (sm70-whynotduesenberg)
11/10/2014 at 23:31 • Filed to: None
7
9|
"sm70- why not Duesenberg?" (sm70-whynotduesenberg)
11/10/2014 at 23:31 • Filed to: None | 7
| 9 |
Tells you !!!error: Indecipherable SUB-paragraph formatting!!! Then tells you they are !!!error: Indecipherable SUB-paragraph formatting!!! Then tells you they are !!!error: Indecipherable SUB-paragraph formatting!!!
!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!
Okay, I'm done on this subject now, but jeez what an ill-conceived article. Obviously, Patrick is entitled to his opinion, as is everyone else. But that would be like me writing a piece about how every convertible looks stupid, and why don't you buy all cars with a roof because that looks better? It's such a matter of opinion and such a blanket statement I actually did a double take when I saw it.
I should add that I enjoy (and agree with) the vast majority of Jalopnik posts, opinion or otherwise. But when I disagree (think back to when Collins did a smidgen of dissing !!!error: Indecipherable SUB-paragraph formatting!!! ) I tend to bitch about it.
!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!
Birddog
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
11/10/2014 at 23:40 |
|
Don't listen to Texans.
Racescort666
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
11/10/2014 at 23:42 |
|
Where's my "that's your opinion, man" meme?
|
sm70- why not Duesenberg?
> Racescort666
11/10/2014 at 23:45 |
|
This one?
Michael Ballaban
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
11/10/2014 at 23:50 |
|
That's the joy of Jalopnik – we tend to disagree with each other, and even ourselves sometimes.
I will say, though, that no matter how beloved your G is, it's not worth anywhere near $140,000. I drove it for a few hours through New Jersey with Collins, and it was hilarious. Collins has good judgment, except when it comes to music, in which case he likes country music, which is terrible.
|
sm70- why not Duesenberg?
> Michael Ballaban
11/10/2014 at 23:53 |
|
I respect your professional opinion, and admit it's probably an overpriced, pointless, and not terribly good car.
And I still want one ;)
ACESandEIGHTS
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
11/10/2014 at 23:55 |
|
He's a good man—and thorough.
Patrick George
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
11/11/2014 at 00:10 |
|
Those were all written by different authors! We all have our own opinions on stuff.
|
sm70- why not Duesenberg?
> Patrick George
11/11/2014 at 00:21 |
|
A valid point.
I'm Abe Froman
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
11/11/2014 at 01:05 |
|
The sweet is never sweet without the sour, my dear boy. People will READ again!